Ontario
Sun Rise From Amherst Island
Great Lake Ice
Wolfe Island’s Wind
Wolfe Island Wind farm is a an omnipresent part of life for some people on the island, but for other’s it is simply a part of the landscape. Do you think it is an environmental move forward, or a mass of metal that pollutes with sound and size? So many quixotically charged these giants before they were there and others invited them into their hearts.
Love them or hate them, the wind farm is now a part of the everyday visual intake of those who live on and around the island. Looking South from Kingston these giants are pretty hard to miss.
Painting 8×10 acrylic of Ian MacAlpine’s photo.
The Trees: Speaking to the Issue
My friend Colleen and I were chatting this morning, as we do from time to time. Our chats are filled with banter about animal ethics, environmental issues, and we also very often speak about the problematic ways in which human beings behave. There is often an emphasis on sheeplism and our frustrations in dealing with this.
During our banter, she mentioned a song called The Trees which is both written and performed by the iconic Canadian rock band Rush. Since I have always been about as far away from the mainstream as possible, I had never heard this song. My loss. It is really great; meaningful on a lot of levels.
The way that this song connected to something that has been on my mind for the last bit was timely. For the last few days I have been thinking a lot about the rules. Not the dating book series, but the rules of society. These rules, while put in place for the good of the whole, lost sight of a lot of things that are perfectly sensible. Specifically, I am speaking about Tiny Houses and the Bylaws that prohibit people from making choices that are better for the land, environment, mental health and in a million and one ways are greater than any McMansion can ever possibly be.
I have for three days had the story on my mind about the fellow who bought some acres in the US and whose neighbour harassed him from the day that he moved there. The story* messed up on so many levels, sort of Deliverance meets the Tiny House movement. The post is interesting but here is my synopsis of it this Deliverance story, the blogger bought land and put a tiny house on it. He hoped to live there for two years but made it only 5 months, in the time that he lived there he was constantly harassed and subjected to all sort of crazy from a weirdo next door (my words, not his).
The question is, who would you rather have for a neighbour? A quiet person whose house is so small that you can’t see it and who leaves the land as natural as it was when the planet formed, or a lout who blares his music, lets his kid, big scary dogs and insanity into your life every day just because you happen to live next door? You guessed it, the lout called the government and they are making him remove his Tiny House from his land. It seems wrong that an innocuous Tiny House can be considered wrong in anyone’s mind.
I am of the opinion that the legality of Tiny Houses should not be questioned. This should not be an issue. If indeed laws are put in place to protect people then who exactly is this law protecting? Why would anyone think that a Tiny House is dangerous?
Is this because refusing to participate in a consumer lifestyle is not acceptable and therefore a crime?
Here are the wonderful lyrics to the song that I think speaks to this issue.
“The Trees”
There is trouble with the trees
For the maples want more sunlight
And the oaks ignore their pleas
(And they’re quite convinced they’re right)
They say the oaks are just too lofty
And they grab up all the light
If they like the way they’re made
And they wonder why the maples
Can’t be happy in their shade
And the creatures all have fled
As the maples scream ‘Oppression!’
And the oaks just shake their heads
And demanded equal rights
‘The oaks are just too greedy
We will make them give us light’
For they passed a noble law
And the trees are all kept equal
By hatchet, axe and saw
Escarpment lookout potential
Wikipedia says: An escarpment is a steep slope or long cliff that occurs from erosion or faulting and separates two relatively level areas of differing elevations.
The land under Tiny House Ontario is on a limestone fault, at a quite high elevation when compared to the surrounding land. There are a lot of rock piles here too.
The closest city to us, is Kingston, Ontario, Canada. Kingston sits at about 25 feet above sea level, whereas Tiny House Ontario, which is within 30 Km of Kingston sits at about 200 feet above sea level. The difference in height is not so great; the approximate height of a 20 story building, and the gradient upward is not a sheer drop. As a matter of fact probably about half of the height is covered in the distance before you arrive at the escarpment, and it is somewhat hilly too, so unless you are on a bicycle or on foot, you would probably not know that you are going up hill.
Along the same escarpment where the road goes though, they have the same elevation as me and because the road is through, you can see Kingston’s water tower, radio towers and also lots of the windmills on Wolfe Island. I have included here some images from two different seasons near the edge of the escarpment on my land and one where the road is open so you can see the height and view.
My cousin Kenny, who knows this land, says that I should remove a few of the softwood trees so that the hard ones will grow larger with the light and I will have a better view. What would you do? Cut a few trees so that you would get a better view and more light? Let it stay the way that it grows naturally?
**Please note that I changed the title of this post from view to lookout because Tiny House Ontario sits far away from the ridge, so any potential for seeing into the distance would be purely as a place to walk to, and lookout from. At Tiny House Ontario, you can see only inside the forest.**





